ADVENTURES IN ADVAITA VEDANTA...

Adventures in Advaita Vedanta, the philosophy and science of spirit. We are one you and I; are you curious why?..


The Lady Dances

Hari OM

Story-day is for cultural exploration, puraanas and parables and finding out about leading lights in spiritual philosophy.

Yesterday, the rather diminished presence of women among the declared sainthood was discussed. Previously here, there has been a post on Hildegarde von Bingen. Now let there be something written on a female saint from the Sanskrit tradition.

Sri Anandamayi Ma

Anandamayi Ma was born in East Bengal (now Bangladesh) in 1896. Her father and mother were well known for their states of bhava or religious emotion. Her mother is said to have had visions whilst pregnant with her daughter, and much later in life also took up the life of a renunciate.

Anandamayi Ma was very sensitive to religious ritual as a child, and the sound of religious chanting would bring about ecstatic feelings in her. Her education was very limited and her writing skills were minimal.

She married at 13 years of age to Ramani Mohan Cakravarti, or Bholanath as he was known, and spent a few years living in her brother-in-law's house, much of it apparently in trance. She was a hard worker but sometimes had a difficult time concentrating on housework. Her relatives assumed that the trances were due to overwork. Her brother-in-law died and she went to live with her husband at age 18, where she met a young man who was impressed by her quiet way of being. He called her "mother" (Ma in Bengali) and predicted that one day the entire world would address her in that way. It was a celibate marriage though not by her husband's choice. Bholanath thought the situation was temporary but it proved to be permanent. His relatives said he should remarry but he did not follow their advice. Later, Bholanath took initiation from her and accepted Anandamayi as his guru.

While living in Dacca, others came to recognize her spiritual qualities. At the sound of religious chanting, she would become stiff and even fall to the ground in a faint. Her body would occasionally become deformed during these events. Sometimes it would lengthen. At others, it would shrink or its limbs would seemingly go into impossible positions as if the skeletal structure had changed shape beneath her skin. She would hold difficult yogic positions (asanas) for long periods and spontaneously form complex tantric hand positions (mudras) and gestures.

Her husband thought she might be possessed and took her to exorcists. One physician suggested she was not mad in the conventional sense but instead had a kind of god intoxication - a divine madness for which there was no secular cure. In 1918 she and her husband moved to Bajitpur where she began to do Shaivite and Vaisnavite spiritual practices. Inner voices would tell her what actions to perform and which images to visualize. Her yogic practices (kryias) were spontaneous and she described them as occurring much like a factory where the various machines all worked automatically and in perfect sequence to produce a product. Anandamayi would shed profuse tears, laugh for hours, and talk at tremendous speed in a Sanskrit-like language. Other unusual actions included rolling in the dust and dancing for long periods whirling like a leaf in the wind. She would also fast for long periods and at other times consume enough food for eight or nine people.
  

Anandamayi went on various pilgrimages traveling throughout India stopping in ashrams and attending religious festivals. She had a temple built for her by disciples in Dacca but left the day it was completed. She travelled to Dehradun where she lived in an abandoned Shiva temple for almost a year without money and often in freezing temperatures without blankets. She was known for her siddhis  (yogic powers) where she could read her devotee's thoughts and emotions at a distance, make her body shrink and expand, and cure the sick. One disciple claimed that she was saved from death after a car accident when Anandamayi grasped her "life substance" and brought it back into her dead body. Anandamayi was sensitive to environmental influences as was demonstrated when she once passed a Muslim tomb. She immediately began to recite portions of the Quran, and to perform the Namaj ritual (Muslim prayers). These and other similar acts showed Anandamayi to be someone always moving through a wide variety of psychic and religious states, each one expressing itself through her. She often objectified her body by describing her actions in phases like "this body did this" or "this body went there". She believed her chaotic actions were expressions of the divine will. She sometimes ascribed her actions to a personal though unnamed god: "I have no sense of pleasure or pain, and I stay as I have always been. Sometimes He draws me outside, and sometimes He takes me inside and I am completely withdrawn. I am nobody, all of my actions are done by him and not by me." 

She also sometimes described herself as completely empty with no sense of the "I am" remaining. She was lost in the great void (mahasunya) which was responsible for her actions. The action that emanated from this void was often chaotic and incoherent. Her view was that a universal state of chaos arises due to spontaneous eruptions of the divine will which arise out of this nothingness. She also talked in theological terms stating that her bhavas or expressions were the play of the Lord (Bhagavan) acting through her body.

Anandamayi considered individual identity to be a kind of spiritual disease. She called it bhava roga, or the disease of feeling where every person looks at him or herself as a separate individual. When some of her disciples complained about the large crowds of people that would sometimes follow her, she responded, "As you do not feel the weight of your head, of hands, and of feet ... so do I feel that these persons are all organic members of THIS BODY; so I don't feel their pressure or find their worries weighing on me. Their joys and sorrows, problems and their solutions, I feel to be vitally mine ... I have no ego sense nor conception of separateness."

She explained that there were four stages in her spiritual evolution. In the first, the mind was "dried" of desire and passion so it could catch the fire of spiritual knowledge easily. Next the body became still and the mind was drawn inward, as religious emotion flowed in the heart like a stream. Thirdly, her personal identity was absorbed by an individual deity, but some distinction between form and formlessness still remained. Lastly, there was a melting away of all duality. Here the mind was completely free from the movement of thought. There was also full consciousness even in what is normally characterized as the dream state. While sometimes speaking of spiritual evolution, she also maintained that her spiritual identity had not changed since early childhood. She claimed that all the outer changes in her life were for the benefit of her disciples.

anandamayi ma picWhen Paramahansa Yogananda met Anandamayi Ma and asked her about her life, she answered: "Father, there is little to tell." She spread her graceful hands in a deprecatory gesture. "My consciousness has never associated itself with this temporary body. Before I came on this earth, Father, 'I was the same.' As a little girl, 'I was the same.' I grew into womanhood, but still 'I was the same.' When the family in which I had been born made arrangements to have this body married, 'I was the same.' … And, Father, in front of you now, 'I am the same.' Ever afterward, though the dance of creation change[s] around me in the hall of eternity, 'I shall be the same.'" (from Paramahansa Yogananda, Autobiography of a Yogi, (New York, Philosophical Library in New York City, 1946), Chapter 46.)

Anandamayi was a holy woman without formal religious training or initiation whose status was based entirely on her ecstatic states. She did not have an outer guru, though she did hear voices that told her what religious and meditative practices to perform. She emphasized the importance of detachment from the world and religious devotion. She also encouraged her devotees to serve others. She did much traveling and wandering, at times refusing to stay at the ashrams her devotees provided for her. While her parents worshiped Krishna, she could not be placed in any definite tradition. An ecstatic child of ecstatic parents, she became a famous saint who stood on the edge of several religious traditions, and in the midst of none. She influenced the spirituality of thousands of people who came to see her throughout her long life, and died in 1982.

(With thanks to Sri Anandamayi Ma site and also Om-Guru website.)




Spiritual Emancipation

Hari Om

'Freedays' are the 'gather our thoughts' days; Q&As; a general review of the week so far…

Having seen so many male Gurus on Story-days and particularly during this Guru-focus month, some readers may be wondering, 'what about the female contingent?' It has to be admitted that there are few Satgurus of the gender. The same is true in all spiritual cultures; majority folk think of 'saints' in terms of the Roman Catholic tradition and it does not take long at all to realise that the ratio of men to women who have been 'canonised' is something in the order of 3+:1. In other words, more than three quarters of the named saints are male.

This is not the place to go into gender politics and the overwhelming inequality of the sexes which has eternally pervaded the human race. What is a little depressing, however, is that there ought to be no call for it in spiritual terms. Here, of all places, ought it not to be found that women might stand on a level with the men?

When one comes to read items of inspiration and teaching from those women who have followed the call of faith, what becomes abundantly clear is that they have strong intellect, sound theological understanding and a crystalline focus on the object of their affection, which is God. 

When looked at purely from the point of view of doctrine - ie man-made interpretation of the rulings of religion - it is clear to see that women are considered incapable of being at all spiritual, that they could not possibly rise to the intellectual demands of theological exegesis, or that their only purpose, surely, is to ensure that the menfolk are cared for and left free to be part of this specialist 'club'. Certain passages of the Bible are put forward as the justification - generally well out of context. (If you are interested in the history of the ordination of women in the Protestant Church, then the place to start is, of course, HERE.) Yet there are strong women who have made their mark; probably more so in the Medieval church than at any other time in religious history.

In the Gospel of Thomas (one of the Gnostic gospels - those teachings considered too 'dangerous' to be included in the Bible, for they empower the seeker fully in the same manner as found in Vedanta), the final verse brings to light what is, perhaps, the crux of the matter;

(114) Simon Peter said to him, "Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life." 
Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven."

Do not misconstrue this to mean some kind of gender-bending! When seen in context of the whole of the teaching, (as well as in conjunction with the fact that Mary also provided a gospel), 'being male' here is about the application of logical thinking; it is about the intellect. This, too, is what Vedanta demands. How many countless generations of men and women have declared that they do not understand each others' thinking?! It is well established, for biological reasons, that there are differences.  Hormones can, and do, have an effect upon brain chemistry. Ask any woman who has experienced 'baby head', or all women who have traversed menopause. It is due to this biological factor, that women, on the whole, are more emotional and inclined to extreme attachment. However, importantly, if the woman is determined, this chemical disorder can be overcome. Mind over matter as it were. The skill of 'remote attachment' can be learned. This does require that the woman sees a point to this empowerment. This is what Yeshu points to - that with the correct learning from a Master, there is absolutely no reason at all that women cannot equal men in the field of theology or spiritual experience… if that is what the women themselves desire.

It is not the teachings which have held women down, but the interpretation of (and the men who have claimed authority in) the teachings which has done so… and quite possibly the women themselves.

Image result for albert einstein on womenGurudev fully approved of women undertaking study of Vedanta at its highest level. The lesser number of females entering Sandeepany was not about any kind of 'quota' but by virtue of the fact that very few women considered the possibility of applying to attend. It is a simple fact that majority women fall into the trap of their own gender and see themselves as being incomplete without home, husband and children - particularly in Indian society, but of course the 'emancipated' Western women on the whole are no different.

The truth is, however, that we all have the potential for sainthood within us. Male, female, makes no difference. The difference comes in who will take up the mantle of discipline and practice to enhance this hidden light. Who has the spiritual courage and determination to live a truly spiritual life...


The Chiff-Chaff of Mano-BuddiH

Hari OM

'Text-days' are for delving into the words and theory of Advaita Vedanta.

TATTVABODHAH.
[You are reminded that reviewing the previous week's posts will become essential as the meanings of the Sanskrit terms may not be repeated. There may come additional or alternative meanings, but all should be noted. As study progresses, the technical terms must necessarily become 'second nature' to the student. When the Sanskrit is used, the translation will fall easily into place - or likewise, if the English is used, the Sanskrit term must easily come forwards.]

Please revisit THIS post and chant the mangala-charana. Please use the TattvabodaH label to access all posts relevant to this text.

(The vid-clip begins with the praanamaya chant from last week.)

पञ्च-कोशाः /pancha-koshaaH - the five sheaths, cont'd.
The following two are so closely related that they are being given together.

मनोमयः कोशः /manomayaH koshaH - the mental sheath.

मनोमयः कोशः कः
मनश्च ज्ञनेन्द्रियपञ्चकं मिलित्वा
यो भवति सः मनोमयः कोशः।

manomayaH koshaH kaH
manashcha GYanendriyapa~nchakaM militvaa
yo bhavati saH manomayaH koshaH.

"What is manomaya  ?"
"The mind and the five organs of perception together form the mental sheath."

विज्ञानमय कोशः /vijnaanamaya koshaH - the intellectual sheath.

विज्ञानमयः कः
बुद्धिर्ज्ञानेन्द्रियपञ्चकं मिलित्वा
यो भ्वति सः विज्ञानमयः कोशः।

viGYaanamayaH kaH
buddhirGYaanendriyapa~nchakaM militvaa
yo bhvati saH viGYaanamayaH koshaH.

"What is vijnaanamaya   ?"
"The intellect and the five organs of perception together is the intellectual sheath."

At first glance it may be thought exactly the same answer is given for both - and in the English translation it could said to be so. However, it must be remembered that Sanskrit is multidimensional in a way that many languages, and English in particular, are not. If you glance again at the Sanskrit (transliteration) you will note that for vijnaana, there is a single prefix to the 'organs' reference, that being 'buddiH'.

In reference to 'mind' then, it is a simple functioning of the organs which is being referenced, but in the case of the intellect, by adding this prefix, the inference is that from the function of those same organs, there is a higher function; that of assessment and anlaysis.

The mind is the seat of emotions like anger, jealousy, love, compassion; it is constituted of thoughts in a state of volition, for example "Shall I read or not?.. Is it fun or not?..." It is the mind which perceives the objective world through the senses (indriyas). If the mind does not back the indriyas, they cannot receive the stimuli. "My eyes may be open, but I have not seen what has happened"… how often have we realised that we haven't heard or seen something due to the mind being 'absent' rather than present in the moment?!

Identified with the mental sheath, the sakshi "I" will say "I am happy/unhappy/growing old/getting deaf…" The True Self is neither happy nor unhappy. It is of the nature of pure bliss.

Meanwhile, the vijnaana (intellectual) part of us is subtler and pervades the preceding koshas. It is firmly associated with mind, but is able to take the stimuli presented via the manomaya and apply decision making. Here at the intellectual level, the sakshi can begin to appreciate "I am infinite… "I" am pure happiness… "I" am not the physical…" et cetera. The intellect is the seat of the values of life which inform our daily lives. What we value we try to emulate. If money is valued most, all efforts will be made to obtain and satisfy what measures up to the ideal which we have. If we value family above all else, we will sacrifice for that family. The intellect discriminates between right and wrong, real and unreal and so forth. To innovate, create, discover, visualise, and to imagine, are all faculties of the vijnaanamaya kosha. The mind carries the sense perceptions to the intellect. Based on previous experience, it recognises, understands and decides on the course of action. It conveys the same back via manomaya to the karmendriyani (organs of action) and the body is operated. Hence the intellect is called the driver of this 'vehicle'.

The vital air, mental and intellectual sheaths together form the subtle body. The key difference between mind and intellect, then, whilst they are essentially the same, is that 'mind feels' whilst 'intellect thinks'. Mind orders the body's reactions, which is why, when there is strong emotion of grief or joy, it activates the heart to pump harder and we are inclined to refer to things 'clutching our heart', or if it is fear or anxiety, we 'feel' it in our abdomen and say that 'my tummy's full of butterflies' - but clear analysis shows that the physical organ of the heart, or the guts, can only function according to what the mind is ordering and therefore, in Vedanta, whenever 'heart' or 'emotion' are discussed, it is in reference to manomaya kosha. Corrective actions to overcome the emotions is the function of the intellect.


A Question of Intent

Hari OM

Application - that is what 'Workings-days' are about!

VEDANTA IN ACTION.
This is the title of a publication from CM which, whilst it of course has items by Gurudev, also includes selections of writing from other well-esteemed Gurus from the Vedantic tradition as well as leading businessmen. Its focus is the working life. We shall be exploring these essays for the next few weeks on Workings-day as, clearly, they pertain directly to the premise of this section of AVBlog! As ever, you  are encouraged to read back over previous posts, to ensure full benefit.

Part 1; Vedanta in Management.

A Vedantic Approach to Management Theory. (Sri Thandaveswara) con'td.

Ethics in Business; One basic task, which has yet to be done, is to validate business as a socially useful enterprise. Business has often been criticized as an economic superstructure that benefits only the wealthy.  We need to redefine business goals and theory to include responsibilities to the society as a whole. Business assumes a validity only in the context of a unity of transaction so supply goods and services desired by the community. However this is contingent on the results it achieves. If a society can achieve these results through other means, there is no necessity for business. Indeed, several societies which are looked down upon as primitive carry on comfortably without the paraphernalia of business as we see it in a free enterprise economy.

Image result for hijack cartoonThe cosy definition of management as the science and art of 'getting things done' adds to the difficulty of defining business goals. What needs to be achieved is not defined, nor are the merits of the methods used examined. According to this definition, hijacking that is extremely well-managed has the same efficiency-rating as the best manufacturing unit. Similarly, compulsive supervisory practices would be considered no less valid than participatory ones, and the latter would be preferred only if they yield better results than the former.

A new, as yet undefined, concept of social responsibility is being developed in an attempt to introduce ethical values into business management.  Leading exponents such as Peter Drucker* have developed the theme of business enterprise as society's instrument for wealth and well-being. However, this does not carry the basic validation of business much further, because here again, society's 'well-being' is not defined or examined. Thus, to take an extreme example, if a society decides that it should live by crime and loot, the organization of this activity in the most efficient manner renders the enterprise a socially responsible entity! As long as business provides what society considers to be wealth and well-being, it gains the status of a socially validated organ. The intricate question of whether management should be concerned with what is socially desirable in contrast with what is socially desired is conveniently ignored.

The net result is the emergence of a business as a result-oriented, expediency-based institution. Society has designed and defined it in this way and, thus, it is perfectly in order for the community to regard it as nothing more. Politicians are blamed for making a convenience of big business. Why not, if they can manage it? Employees are blamed for demanding too much. Why not, if they can get it? Governments are blamed for over-taxing the businessmen. Why not, if they can get away with it? Questions of this kind are clearly not answerable in terms of enterprise theory as it has developed so far.

Alternative Business Models of business enterprise have been generated by Marxists, mid-socialists and other economic systems in reaction to, or often in confrontation with, the traditional capitalist model.  At one extreme are totalitarian systems, where enterprise is an organ of the state rather than of the society and must function under sheer obedience to political compulsions.  Many of these systems have note-worthy material achievements to their credit. However, in terms of human fulfilment, general happiness, and the sense of sharing cherished values, the results have often been negative.  More moderate deviations, such as socialism, have the experience of falling between two schools. They have missed the abundance and affluence of capitalistic systems as well as the equally distributed amenities of totalitarian systems, with the result that most of them keep swinging between persistent and often violent pulls from the right or the left.

The business organisation as it exists today has failed to create and sustain socially desirable values. This failure can be seen around the world, regardless of the political or economic system.

A major advancement in management has been the use of motivation instead of compulsion.  Motivation is the process of relating incentives to a current need of the individual.  Some incentives are at the physical level, while others are at the psychological. The reason for using certain incentives at certain times is a function of their achieved need satisfaction at any given time.

In contrast is the Vedantic view, which views the human personality as a product of the past, carrying with it susceptibilities for motivation which are internal, inherent and persistent. These susceptibilities give rise to self-unfolding impulses, whose fulfilment then becomes the basis for motivation.  This Vedantic view does not accept the successional visualisation of motivation as, for example, Maslow's hierarchic model. Maslow postulates that individuals have universal needs of ascending priority; in other words that all individuals follow the same predictable chain of needs and desires [thus negating the concept of 'individual'].  These basic conceptual differences should not be dismissed as merely theoretical, for their differing logic produces fundamentally different techniques of motivation. Management practices which are guided by the Western models often create in the Eastern environment more hostility and conflict than harmony or achievement. As a result, the doctrine of motivation is regarded in the East more as a manipulative technique than as an endeavour to draw out, develop and fulfil the human personality. **

A harmful consequence of this Western model of material motivation is a dichotomy of life. Workers as well as managers view their profession merely as a means of livelihood and they look for fulfilment of life outside their profession.  They defer to the values of the industry at work and cultivate what they consider to be their own true values outside of work; so much so that to many there seems to be no reason why they should practice the ethical values in business which they meticulously practice in personal life. A cynical way of life develops in which success, however achieved, is the rule at work and the moral code is the rule at home.
  
[*Drucker taught that management is “a liberal art,” and he infused his management advice with lessons from history, sociology, psychology, philosophy, culture and religion. He also believed strongly that all institutions, including those in the private sector, have a responsibility to the whole of society. “The fact is,” Drucker wrote,“that in modern society there is no other leadership group but managers. If the managers of our major institutions, and especially of business, do not take responsibility for the common good, no one else can or will.] Pasted from <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Drucker>

[**...it could be argued that there are many in 'the West' who feel equally manipulated by the corporations for whom they work!


Be Careful What You Wish For

Hari Om

Each 'Choose-day' we will investigate the process by which we can reassess our activity and interaction with the world of plurality and become more congruent within our personality.

We are reading the small booklet called "Not Too Loose, Not Too tight - Just right!" This is written by Swamini Vimalananda, and gives a very general overview of Vedanta for the beginner, with emphasis on the sattvic, rajasic and tamasic approaches to life. Remember, we are a mixture of all; use this as your mirror.

काम /kaama - desires.

All actions are prompted by desires. Desires spring from a sense of unfulfillment. Even though the sense of this lack is common, our desires can be sattvic, rajasic or tamasic, depending on what we feel will give us that the fulfillment.

Image result for fire and smokeSattvic; desire to serve others, improve oneself, act well, gain knowledge, reach God, search for Truth, be with nature and alleviate sorrow are sattvic. They add beauty to a person. Actions prompted by such desires pave the way for inner unfoldment and sattvic joy.  They are compared to smoke which adds beauty to a fire (dhuumena avriyate vahniH). Desires do arise, therefore ensure that they are sattvic. Intention behind action can make all the difference to outcomes.

Rajasic; desire for name, fame, wealth, status, power or pleasure are rajasic.  The desire to assert, dominate, possess, change others or humble them are also due to rajo-guna. These cause lots of stress, strain, restlessness, craving and the drive for competition. They are compared to the dust that covers a mirror (yatha adarsha malenacha), which prevents us from seeing ourselves as we are. The 'duster' of right attitude and efforts are needed to remove ego-prompted rajasic desires. If our motives are small and self-serving, sattva cannot bloom.

Tamasic; desire for inaction, enjoyment without effort, the need to be served and the drive to terrorise or harm others are tamasic.  These make man slothful or criminally minded. They are compared to the foetus in a womb (yatha ulbena aavritam garbhaH). It takes a lot of effort, time and pain to get rid of our tamasic desires.  For instance, a person has to go through some trauma to come out of alcoholism, drug addition or a life of crime. These are extreme examples; but it is to emphasise that tamas is strong. The child who will not rise on time, who is inattentive to studies and fails exams because they are indifferent to the advantages it can gain them has an equal struggle. Such a child, unless helped to rise out of this behaviour, will likely be an equally dull adult, contributing little to society, and possibly expecting much in return for their nothing.


Split Personality

Hari OM

Monday is AUM-day; in search of meditation.

Meditation & Life, with Sw. Chinmayananda (Gurudev).
We are now exploring the writings of Gurudev on our focus subject of Meditation. The book is a thorough treatment of the subject and extends to over 170 pages of closely printed text. No attempt is intended, here, to present the text in its entirety. However, important paragraphs and quotes will be given, within a summary of each section. You are encouraged to use the links on sidebar to obtain a copy for yourselves from CM publications.
Please remember that each of the posts under this title is part of a thought flow and it is important to go back and read the previous post in order to refresh and review the context.

4: Spirit Enveloped in Matter
The Hydra-Headed Monster.
In reality, we nothing but the 'life centre'; ever were, are now and always will be.  Due to falling into an ego identity with the sheaths, we have come to believe we are the body. We identify with each of the sheaths at different times with '"I" am short (annamaya)…"I" am doubtful (manomaya)…"I" have no idea (vijananmaya)' and so on. We are constantly bounced around in our own delusion, one minute it's about the physical comforts, next its all about our feelings, or another is about ideology.  Each of our 'personalities' has its own requirements to be satisfied and they are not necessarily the same as for another; what suits the body may not suit the intellect; what suits the mind may be contraindicated by the praana… In each of us there is a war going on with that is best for 'us' - multifacted personality that we are!

When we identify with one or another of the upaadhis (envelopments - another name for koshas), we come to suffer the sense of limitation, sorrow and unrest which comes with having to balance them all. In this sense, samsaara, the writhing sea of life, is our own creation. What happens, very often, is that we are generally disposed to sacrifice the grosser in order to satisfy the subtler. For example, if we have a gangrenous leg, we will permit the surgeon to remove it in order to cure the agitation and pain it is causing. In another instance, when an ideal takes possession of a person's intellect, her or she is ready to suffer much for the sake of those cherished convictions. Thus, when we identify with our intellect, to ensure its satisfaction, we are prepared to ignore the demands of all the 'selves' which are grosser to it.

Therefore it is easy to understand the Rsis, who, after discovering their real nature to be nothing but aatman, cheerfully suffered mental pains and mortifications of the flesh. Christ crucified could sincerely pray "Father forgive them, for they know not what they do."  Mahatma Gandhi, collapsing with bullet wounds, could still chant the name of God, "Ram Ram".

"The masters of the Upanishads declared that their observations on our multiple personalities need not dishearten us.  Instead, these facts should encourage us to venture forth into a closer and more diligent observation of life. The Rsis explained a method of self-effort by which we can dissociate ourselves from the false attachments and wrong identifications with the matter envelopments and rediscover ourselves to be in essence nothing but the eternally sweet spirit.  The process by which this consummation can finally take place is meditation."

Rediscovery of the Self does not only end all our confusions but is an ascent into the state of 'supermanhood'… Godhood. The Rsis could see this potential in mankind and provided material by which each individual could follow that path. The onus is upon us to do so. "Let us offer our animal values of life as oblations to the fires of our discrimination. This is jnaana yoga, the way of the  discriminating mind. Blind faith born of fear and thriving on ignorance is a veritable chain of slavery. Knowledge alone lends an edge and gives a positive direction to our spiritual quest."


To The Cowherd

Hari OM


Sounds-day is for listening/viewing a variety of devotional items from and for all ages and traditions.

The Malladi Brothers are wonderful proponents of Carnatic music. They most kindly offered a concert to the students at Sandeepany Sadhanalaya and joyous evening was had by all! They had been balavihar and CHYK members, so paid great honour to Gurudev.  Please enjoy this short recording from them singing the praises of Sri Krishna.